@gsuberland @dangoodin And even then, that's just a representative that just said, on record, that they sell printers with firmware so badly written that you can infect it through an interface.
Really not sure how fast any interviewer must have been asleep at that point to not jump up and say something like "so you're saying all your printers are a security risk and should not be used where confidential documents are printed? Are you going to issue a recall or just send replacements?"
Hey @gsuberland, totally fine with you perusing my talking point there, but would love if you added a link to my post above to your current "CEOs like that need to be called out on their BS" thread :) (I'm not into fame, it's just that I know that due to mastodon's sketchy nearly-federation, chances are a lot of your subscribers will not see that context, being from a different server)
@funkylab I wasn't specifically persuing your point (I had the same conversation off-site and IRL in tandem, and the same points were made) but can still link if you want?
@gsuberland no really, if you think the thread you link to is enough context in itself, that's fine. Really really not keen on the notification torrent this might bring, especially since everything even remotely infosec related is just a magnet for bad hot takes...
@funkylab with you being on m.s it should federate to pretty much everywhere anyway so if folks are reading the thread they'll see your replies ^_^
